Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Morris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1944No. 4-7426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The primary purpose of appellees in this suit was to cancel a quitclaim deed.

October 26,1922, J. A. Morris, as owner, by warranty deed, conveyed to his brother, R. J. Morris, “The west half of the southeast quarter of section eleven (11) township nineteene (19) S. range 21 west, containing in all eighty acres more or less. It is understood and agreed that the seller retaines % of the minerals and mineral rights in and to said lands. It is further agreed that the seller releases all wright in so far as to all lease contracts to the said lands.” This land was, at this time, subject to an oil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephens v. KeenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Gammill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Luther v. BonnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Swayne v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873
  5. Grismore v. UtleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petree v. PetreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Little Rock Junior College v. George W. Donaghey FoundationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Eaton v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Heekin Can Co. v. KimbroughDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API