Diggs v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of forgery by a jury. 1 After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a term of 17 years and a $2,000 fine. In two points of error, appellant contends: (1) that the trial court erred in limiting her cross-examination of the complaining witness; and (2) that it was legally impossible for her to commit a forgery because she held a community interest in the funds. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Virgil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Koehler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- People v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. Van SkanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Anthony Gene Harrington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Jason Jeffrey Olson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.