Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bryan v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2003No. 03-CO-819Published

1DissentGlickman, Associate Judge

In ordering Cleveland Bryan detained without bond until his trial, the motions judge relied on a statutory presumption of dangerousness. That presumption properly arises only when the judge is able to find by a “substantial probability” that the defendant committed a crime of violence while armed with a firearm. See D.C.Code § 23-1322(c) (2001). A higher standard of proof than probable cause, “substantial probability” calls upon the judge to determine after an adversary hearing whether the prosecution is likely to succeed in proving the charged offense at trial. This appears to be the first…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API