Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Ridge
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1996No. 2:96-cv-04941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are sixty-six physicians licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. The defendants are the Governor, the Director of the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund, (“the CAT Fund”), the Inspector General, the Insurance Commissioner, the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania, and members of the State Boards of Medicine, Osteopathic Medicine, and Podiatry.
Nineteen of the plaintiffs have requested a preliminary injunction against the CAT Fund officials and the three licensing boards to restrain the boards from taking any further…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ecri, a Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw Inc., McGraw Information Systems Co., and McGraw Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Maia Caplan, in 95-1445 v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman. Maia Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman, Vigilant Insurance Company, in 95-1478Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Michael F. Walsh, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Local 799, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Suarez Cestero v. Pagan RosaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Gawker Media, LLC v. BolleaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021