United States v. Gerald F. Whitmore
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing, filed April 19, 2004 and the appellant’s response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be denied. The government’s petition for rehearing “does not seek to change the panel’s ultimate disposition of this appeal” nor does it “challenge the panel’s conclusion that the district court erred in excluding the entire line of cross-examination concerning Soto’s prior testimony.” Pet. at 2 (internal quotation marks omitted). Indeed, the government “agrees that on remand Officer Soto can properly be cross-examined…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Vincent R. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Whitmore, Gerald F.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Price v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
4Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Pierre Dawson and Alphonso IngramCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- State of Maine v. Keith ColemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Abdulsalam Ali Al-Hela v. Joseph Biden (REISSUED)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- National Trust for Historic Preservation v. SemoniteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- State of Maine v. Keith ColemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.