Legal Opinion

Caesar v. Brookman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alice Schlesinger, J.

Plaintiff Chris Caesar commenced this podiatric malpractice action without the help of any attorney on March 30, 2015 against defendant Dr. Frederick R. Brookman. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) as barred by the statute of limitations. As set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied, as the court finds that the doctrine of continuous treatment applies to these circumstances, effectively extending the requisite time to commence the action.

Background Facts

On September 28, 2012, plaintiff presented to defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Petito v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API