Legal Opinion

City of Guthrie v. Nix, Halsell & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for Re-Hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McAtee, J.:

The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in 3 Oklahoma Reports, p. 136, where it was considered upon a question of pleading.

It was assigned for error that the court refused to give instructions numbered 5 and 6, which were offered on behalf of the defendant upon the trial, which are as follows:

“ If you find from the evidence that the street in front of the building occupied by the plaintiffs, under the sidewalk, had been excavated by persons other than the defendant, and that such excavation tended to allow water flowing over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Smith v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Nelson v. GodfreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. City of Guthrie v. BeamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dell Rapids Mercantile Co. v. City of Dell RapidsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Norman Milling & Grain Co. v. BethuremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Wendt v. Incorporated Town of AkronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Ginter v. Rector of St. Mark's ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Norman Milling & Grain Co. v. BethuremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API