Legal Opinion

Norman Milling & Grain Co. v. Bethurem

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1914No. 2994Published

Error from District Court, Cleveland County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by E. A. Bethurem against the Norman Milling & Grain Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. On rehearing former opinion adhered to.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

TPIACKER, C.

Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

In August, 1909, and at all times since about January, 1903, defendant, a public service corporation, owned and operated electric current wires strung about 24% or 26% feet above the ground, and almost immediately over the center of the tops of certain black locust trees, about seventeen or eighteen in number, in a parking on a street in the city of Norman; and plaintiff, the abutting lot owner, haying, in about 1896, set and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Donahue v. . Keystone Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Rosenthal v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Board of Trade Telegraph Co. v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. City of Mt. Carmel v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API