Corning v. Burton
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Midland. (Hart,. J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainants appeal from a decree denying their petition for execution for deficiency. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
7 Hooker, J.
On May 8, 1886, Burton and Ellsworth •executed and delivered to Corning a promissory note for $3,200, and secured it by a mortgage upon real estate. In October, 1887, Burton deeded an undivided half of the premises to Dickerson, the deed stating that it was subject to a mortgage of $3,200 and accrued interest thereon, “one-half of which incumbrarice^Shd debt said second party [i. ■e., Dickerson] assumes and agrees to pay.” On November 10, 1887, Ellsworth deeded to Dickerson the other undivided half of the land, by a deed containing similar provisions. On July 25, 1888, said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Turrill v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guardian Depositors Corp. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Anderson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Tapert v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.