United States v. Robinson
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1DissentPaulson, Judge
Although not expressly raised as an issue on appeal, I find no violation of the appellant’s 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial. Weighing the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), I find no prejudice to the substantial rights of the appellant, particularly since he was not in pretrial confinement.
Also, I find no violation of Rule for Courts-Martial 707, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.)[hereinafter R.C.M.] The majority opinion has appeal in logic, and I am concerned about the “learning point” which might be drawn from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BoladoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. MicklaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. MucthisonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.