Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Robinson

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 25, 1997No. NMCM 96 01270Published

1DissentPaulson, Judge

Although not expressly raised as an issue on appeal, I find no violation of the appellant’s 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial. Weighing the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), I find no prejudice to the substantial rights of the appellant, particularly since he was not in pretrial confinement.

Also, I find no violation of Rule for Courts-Martial 707, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.)[hereinafter R.C.M.] The majority opinion has appeal in logic, and I am concerned about the “learning point” which might be drawn from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. BoladoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. MicklaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. MucthisonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API