Legal Opinion

Connell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 2, 1985No. 84-58PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles Connell sued State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and insurance agent Perry Davis for misrepresentation in the course of issuing a policy of insurance to Connell. The trial court granted summary judgment for State Farm and Connell appeals.

The facts of this case are as follows:

Connell met with Davis, who had been a State Farm agent for 19 years, for the purpose of securing a health insurance policy which would pay for a work related injury and make up for the excess beyond workmen's compensation coverage. Connell told Davis what he wanted, and Davis recommended a policy he thought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Life Insurance Company of Georgia v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Alabama Mutual Fire Insurance v. MinchenerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Flamme v. Wolf Insurance AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. SouthTrust Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. American Bankers Insurance Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte RagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API