Legal Opinion

Bright v. Dicke

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1994No. 3-93-0729PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE SLATER

delivered the opinion of the court:

Faith Dicke (hereinafter defendant) filed an application for leave to appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308). We granted leave to appeal to consider whether a trial court has discretion under Supreme Court Rule 216 (134 Ill. 2d R. 216) to allow a party to file a late response to a request to admit.

On January 21,1993, plaintiff filed a two-count complaint alleging that defendant breached her fiduciary duties as trustee of the Leonard E. Dicke Trust and that she also breached a purported settlement agreement. On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johannsen v. General Foods Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Kismer v. AntonovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bright v. DickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cothren v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Bright v. DickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Sassali v. DeFauwAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Sassali v. DeFauwAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API