Legal Opinion

S. Siwel Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1946No. L. A. 18935Published

1Opinion of the Court

27 Cal.2d 724 (1946)

S. SIWEL CO. (a Corporation), Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 18935.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 19, 1946.

Murphey & Davis and Alex W. Davis for Appellant.

J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, A. Curtis Smith, Deputy County Counsel, and Clyde Woodworth, City Attorney (South Gate), for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

Under protest the S. Siwel Co. paid special assessments levied by the city of South Gate, and brought this action to obtain a refund. Upon the appeal from the judgment of dismissal entered after a general demurrer to the complaint…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API