Legal Opinion

City of Snohomish v. Joslin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 6, 1973No. 1831-42344-1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

— Upon discovering that defendant Joslin’s residence encroached approximately 10 feet upon the city’s Pine Street, the City of Snohomish brought this action seeking an abatement. Joslin cross claimed asserting that, by the construction of Maple Street, an undedicated roadway, the city had encroached upon the easterly 12 feet of his property and upon the triangular-shaped southern tip of the property where Pine and Maple Streets converge. The trial judge resolved the issues by: (1) directing a verdict in favor of the city abating Joslin’s encroachment upon Pine Street; (2) directing a verdict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. City of Renton v. Dillingham Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API