Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stayton's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 26, 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION op the Court by

Judge Turner

Reversing.

Richard Stay ton was, in November, 1912, employed by appellant as a member of a bridge painting crew, and on the 22nd of November, 1912, that crew was paint*761ing an iron overhead bridge on appellant’s line in Nelson County.

The crew consisted of the foreman, Clapham and Stayton, Basham, Unseld, and Troutman. The workmen under the superivsion of Clapham were painting the outside of this iron bridge, Stayton and Basham being on the staging or scaffold on one side of the bridge, and Unseld and Troutman on a similar structure on the other side, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuart's Admr. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Weidekamp's Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Campbell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Gregory's Administratrix v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Louisville Railway Co. v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stokes' AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Mountain Motor Fuel Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API