Legal Opinion
Szydlowski v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1992No. 91AP-1258PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Whiteside, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Debra Szydlowski and Teresa Gould, appeal from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims and raise three assignments of error as follows:
“I. The trial court erred to plaintiffs’ prejudice by ruling that a psychological aide employed by the defendant to provide psychological counseling services could not have been acting within the scope of his employment when he engaged in sexual conduct with the plaintiffs while also finding that the sexual conduct foreseeably arose from the discharge of job related duties.
“II. The trial court erred to plaintiffs’ prejudice by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Burkey v. Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Schulman v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Caruso v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Browning v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stephens v. A-Able Rents Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Armstrong v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2011
- Atkinson v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.