Palmer v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILL, Justice.
Harold Lee Palmer appeals his conviction by a jury for the offense of passing a forged writing, a check. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 32.21 (Vernon 1974). The jury found an enhancement paragraph to be true and assessed his punishment at fifteen years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $5,000. In his sole point of error, Palmer asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. Palmer specifically urges that the State failed to meet its burden of establishing that he passed the forged instrument with intent to defraud or harm, apparently…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Stuebgen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Pfleging v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wallace v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Christopher Ray Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Griffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Harrelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.