Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided August 13, 1999Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Brent Davis Prosecuting Attorney Second Judicial Circuit Craighead County Courthouse 511 Union, Suite 342 Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401
Dear Mr. Davis:
This is in response to your request, submitted by Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Alan Copelin, for an opinion on the following question:
If the county seeks to spend road millage funds for the purpose of improving and/or widening its roads and there are utility poles within the county's right of way that prevent these improvements, who must pay for the removal or relocation of each utility pole?
It is my opinion that the answer to this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Ark. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pine Belt Chevrolet, Inc. v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State Highway Commission v. Sheridan-Johnson Rural Electrification Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Damé Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.