Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rabren v. Pullman Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1971No. 3 Div. 454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The facts in this case are not in dispute and were stipulated between the parties as follows:

“1. Plaintiff [Pullman] is an Illinois • corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois, and is authorized to do business in the State of Alabama.
“2. Defendant is Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Alabama and is charged with the duty of collection [sic] the license tax described in Title 51, Section 186, Code of Alabama, Recompiled 1958.
“3. That heretofore on December 27, 1967, the plaintiff paid tax described in Title 51, Section 186, Code of Alabama,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. International Harvester Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Sadler v. LanghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Melof v. HuntDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API