Legal Opinion

Melof v. Hunt

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided July 13, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-T-379-NPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This lawsuit, filed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1500, 103 L.Ed.2d 891 (1989), contests the manner in which the State of Alabama taxes retirement income. The plaintiffs, who receive retirement benefits, challenge the fact that the state wholly or partially exempts certain benefits while completely taxing others. The plaintiffs contend that the Alabama method of taxing retirement benefits violates the intergovernmental immunity doctrine, as limited and…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Johnsen v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Ex Parte SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Iberia Lineas Aereas De Espana v. Velez-SilvaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API