Legal Opinion

Landon v. Court of Industrial Relations of Kansas

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 24, 1920No. 136-NPublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John M. Randon and another, as receivers of the Kansas Natural Gas Company, against the Court of Industrial Relations of the State of Kansas and others. On hearing on supplemental answers in the nature of applications by the defendant gas distributing companies for a decree setting aside the order of the Court of Industrial Relations, denying the petitions of the distributing companies for an increase in rates, and establishing a' standard of leakage.

Read the full summary

In Equity. Suit by John M. Randon and another, as receivers of the Kansas Natural Gas Company, against the Court of Industrial Relations of the State of Kansas and others. On hearing on supplemental answers in the nature of applications by the defendant gas distributing companies for a decree setting aside the order of the Court of Industrial Relations, denying the petitions of the distributing companies for an increase in rates, and establishing a' standard of leakage. Order held unreasonable and confiscatory, in so far as it denied the increased rates, and the enforcement of that portion…

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

The above cause comes on for hearing upon the supplemental answers in the nature of applications by several distributing companies on the line of the receiver of the Kansas Natural Gas Company for a decree setting aside the order made by the -Court of Industrial Relations, dated August 18, 1920, which denied the petitions of said distributing companies for leave to increase the present 80-cent rate for natural gas, and ordered them to reduce the leakage in their respective systems to a standard of 200,000 cubic feet per annum per mile of 3-inch main equivalent. Any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Public Util. Comm'n of Kan. v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. NewtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & TeleGraph Co. v. Railroad Commission of South CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
  3. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. City of Texarkana, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WhitcombDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  5. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API