Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Riley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1981No. 1189PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that: (1) his warrantless arrest lacked probable cause; and (2) pre-trial identifications by two Commonwealth witnesses and two statements by him should have been suppressed because of an unnecessary delay in his arraignment. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.

On November 16, 1976, at about 9:50 a. m., a Philadelphia policeman responding to a disorderly crowd complaint saw appellant shouting and carrying a large radio which he was playing loudly. The officer approached appellant, took him to the patrol car, and requested…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. MinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Harvey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Paxton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API