Legal Opinion

Steury v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1988No. 35A02-8606-CV-218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

BUCHANAN, Judge.

NIPSCO seeks rehearing from our decision in Steury v. Northern Indiana Pub. Serv. Co. (1987), Ind.App., 510 N.E.2d 213. In our opinion, we concluded that summary judgment was inappropriate because a contractor, under certain factual cireumstance-es, could be subrogated to the rights of the homeowners in a negligence action against NIPSCO when the home was damaged by an explosion allegedly due to a gas line fracture.

NIPSCO argues on rehearing that the right of subrogation does not arise unless the claim of the homeowners is entirely paid. Assuming that payment is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stuteville v. DowningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Sink & Edwards, Inc. v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Creighton v. Caylor-Nickel Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Steury v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API