Legal Opinion · Concurrence

American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2006No. 49A02-0507-CV-684Published

1ConcurrenceMay, Judge

Because our opinion reaches the only result our Trial Rules permit, I concur. Nevertheless, I write separately to note my concerns about the possible implications of this result and to suggest modification of Trial Rule 75(A)(10).

Subsection (A)(10) of Trial Rule 75 determines preferred venue because the defendant, Ford, is a “nonresident organization without a principal office in the state.” Under that subsection, preferred venue is in “the county where ... the principal office of any plaintiff organization ... is located, or the office of any such plaintiff organization ... to which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Co. v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Risner v. GibbonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Steury v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Appalachian Insurance v. BettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Steury v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API