Legal Opinion

Johnson v. McClure

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1904No. Nos. 13,889—(131)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court 'for Washington county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Williston, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover a balance alleged to be due on the purchase price of certain lands sold by plaintiff to defendants, in which defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appealed.

The facts are as follows: In 1893 plaintiff and defendants and one Nelson entered into a contract whereby they agreed to purchase and become the owners of a large tract of la-nd for the aggregate price of $510,000. Defendant McClure was to furnish one-fourth of the purchase price, defendant Bean one-half, and plaintiff, Johnson, and said Nelson one-eighth each, of the purchase price; and each was to receive conveyances…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Collins v. TillouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  4. Green v. BatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Langan v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gustafson v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Thiem v. EckertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API