Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power Authority of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
On appeal, six Niagara-area customers of the Power Authority of the State of New York (“PASNY”) argue that the language, legislative history and purpose of the Niagara Redevelopment Act (“NRA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 836-836a (1988), require PASNY to sell so-called Replacement Power from the Niagara hydroelectric project to them at a rate equal to PASNY’s cost of production. Accordingly, these customers — large, industrial, long-time, low-cost power consumers — argue that the construction of the statute by the District Court for the Western District of New York, John T. Curtin,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Power Authority of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Municipal Electric Utilities Association of New York, State of New York Public Service Commission, Expansion Power Industries, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company, Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, Bethlehem Steel Corp., General Motors Corp., Occidental Chemical Corp., Hooker Industrial & Specialty Chemicals, Olin Corp. And Union Carbide Corp., Vermont Department of Public Service, Borough of Lansdale, Pennsylvania, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power Authority of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Power Authority Of The State Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993