Legal Opinion

Appeal of the Office of the Consumer Advocate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 1991No. 90-254; No. 90-476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The Office of the Consumer Advocate (OCA) appeals from decisions of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC), modifying an order issued in a previous rate case and granting Southern New Hampshire Water Company, Inc.’s (Southern) petition for a temporary rate increase pursuant to RSA 378:27. The OCA argues that the PUC had no authority to modify its prior order and, alternatively, that in doing so, it violated RSA chapter 541-A and denied consumers due process. Further, it contends that the PUC’s temporary rate order is invalid, because an impartial tribunal would not have granted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Legislative Utility Consumers' Council v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Burhoe v. WhalandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Appeal of Annelie MullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  3. Appeal of TrotzerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API