Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Starkes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1975No. 356PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Justice.

In the instant case, the appellant, Roddy Starkes, seeks a reversal of the judgment of sentence on the ground that incriminating statements made by him to police offi*181cials were improperly introduced into evidence at his trial. After careful consideration of the record before us, we agree with this contention and hold that the judgment of sentence must be reversed and a new trial awarded.

Appellant and a co-defendant, Curtis Redmond, were arrested and charged with the robbery-murder of Mr. Edward Stradling which occurred on February 12, 1970, in the home of the victim.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. ChaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API