Legal Opinion
Yonemoto v. McDonald
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 10, 2015No. Civil No. 11-00533 JMS-RLPPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District • Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The court conducted a non-jury trial in this case on May 5-8, 11-14, and 27-29, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the following constitute the court’s Findings of Fact (“Findings”) and Conclusions of Law (“Conclusions”). To' the extent any Findings as stated may also be deemed to be Conclusions, they shall also be considered Conclusions. Similarly, to the extent any Conclusions as stated may be deemed to be Findings, they shall also be considered Findings. See In re Bubble Up…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Danny Snapp v. Bnsf Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Weeks v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Pratt v. Hawai'iDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- McCarthy v. BrennanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- (PS) Auten v. County of CalaverasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.