Legal Opinion
Davis v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1928No. 20569PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
An information was filed in the Municipal Court of Cleveland, Ohio, charging Gertrude Davis with having violated Section 13145 of the General Code, prohibiting and penalizing fortune-telling. The information charged continuous violations from May.9, 1925, to May 19, 1925. Section 13145, General Code, provides:
“Whoever, not having been legally licensed so to do, represents himself to be an astrologer, fortune-teller, clairvoyant or palmister, shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than one hundred dollars or imprisoned in jail not less than thirty days nor more than three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- People v. ElmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. NeitzelWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Fay v. LambourneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by22 opinions
- Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- NEFEDRO v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Turner v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- White v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- In Re BarthaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.