Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Griffo v. McCandless

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1928No. M-137PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The conclusion reached is that the relator be discharged without day. The question here is wholly one of power. We do not go (beyond the record of conviction) into the vexing question of what kind of an act evidences “moral turpitude,” further than to note that the public authorities have passed upon the character of this alien’s conduct, and we would see no need to review their judgment. Assuming the alien here has been guilty of .conduct evidencing such moral turpitude as would (if the power exists) justify a sentence of deportation, the question recurs: Have the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. United States ex rel. Mylius v. UhlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. Weedin v. Tayokichi YamadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. United States ex rel. Morlacci v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1925
  5. Ex parte SaracenoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. United States Ex Rel. Zaffarano v. CorsiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. United States ex rel. Manzella v. ZimmermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API