Legal Opinion

People v. Sistrunk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 1994No. 1-88-3484, 1-92-2607PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Following a bench trial, defendant Clarence Sistrunk was convicted of murder and attempted armed robbery. The trial court imposed a 36-year sentence of imprisonment for the murder conviction and a seven-year prison term for the attempted armed robbery conviction, the sentences to run concurrently.

On appeal defendant raises six issues: (1) whether the juvenile court erred in granting the State’s motion to prosecute defendant as an adult when defendant was 14 years old at the time the offenses were committed; (2) whether defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. People v. WankeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. SimsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. LuckettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. State v. LennonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API