Legal Opinion

Steblay v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1935No. 30,227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Action on four promissory notes upon which $1,650 remained unpaid. The main defenses set up by the separate answers of defendants were lack of consideration and that the notes were obtained by duress. The verdict was in favor of defendants. The appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

After making out a prima facie case by the introduction of the notes, plaintiff rested. The burden of establishing their claims by a preponderance of the evidence then shifted to the defendants. The main question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Brown v. WorthingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. American National Bank v. HellingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Co. v. A. Wells Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Harry S. Diffenderfer v. Heublein, Inc., a Corporation, and Ralph A. HartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Diffenderfer v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  4. Bank of Tucson v. AdrianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API