Legal Opinion

Lavoie v. North British & Mercantile Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 23, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The essential issue is of the validity of the cancellation of the first policy. If it was not cancelled before the fire, liability on it ensues to the exclusion of liability on the substituted policies. In defending against liability on the substituted policies the insurers issuing them were entitled to seek to prove as a determinative fact the continuance in force of the first policy at the time of the fire. What the plaintiff had done, by himself or through agency in his behalf, and the authority of such agency to act in his behalf, became material. The plaintiff might waive the right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Co. v. SydemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Stebbins v. Lancashire Ins.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrar v. MayabbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. LaFrance Workshop Lampshade Co. v. Fire Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Clapperton v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Passarello v. Lexington Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API