Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. First Nat. Bank of Borger
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 1, 1931No. 3583PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRandodph, J.
The plaintiff, the First National Bank of Wichita Falls, instituted this suit in the district court of Wichita county, against the de- femdants First National Bank of Borger and the City National Bank of Wichita Falls, to recover of the said defendants money paid out l>y plaintiff upon a forged cheek, which payment was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants banks.
•The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing by its suit.
The trial court filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The pleadings and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City Bank of Houston v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank of QuitmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- First National Bank v. City National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Rouvant v. San Antonio National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Wood CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Hampton State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Pittsburg Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., Etc. v. Dade Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Citizens State Bank v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Marlin Nat. Bank v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.