Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 24, 2005No. 7:03-cv-00171PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). [DE #’s 7 & 13]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), United States Magistrate Judge Christina L. Demory entered a memorandum recommending that the court deny plaintiffs motion, grant defendant’s motion, and uphold the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits. Plaintiff timely filed an objection to the memorandum and recommendation (“M & R”), and defendant did not file a response. In this posture, the matter is ripe for ruling. For the reasons…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seabolt v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Newton v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Baldwin v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Bullock v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Duncan v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.