Union Pacific Railroad v. Pacific Market Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
ERROR to tbe District Court, Albany County, Volney J. Tidball, Judge. On petition for rehearing. For former opinion, see 27 Wyo. 501; 200 Pae. 108.
1Opinion of the Court
PotteR, Chief Justice.
The defendant in error has filed a petition for rehearing in this ease, specifying the following points: (1) That the court erred in holding that the presentation of the claim was not a sufficient compliance with the bill of lading; (2) that the court erred in remanding the cause with directions to enter a judgment for the defendant.
With reference to the first point, it is contended, as upon the previous hearing, that the case of Kidwell v. Oregon S. L. R. R. Co., 208 Fed. 3, 125 C. C. A. 313, cited and quoted from in our former opinion, is in conflict with and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bronstein v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MoxleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- E. H. Emery & Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wood v. Geis Trucking Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982