Melendez v. San Francisco Baseball Assocs. LLC
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Chin, J.
*5 Under California's labor laws, "[i]f an employer discharges an employee, the wages earned and unpaid at the time of discharge are due and payable immediately." ( Lab. Code, § 201, subd. (a).) Plaintiffs, security guards at what used to be named AT & T Park in San Francisco and is now named Oracle Park (the park), are suing San Francisco Baseball Associates LLC (the Giants) for allegedly violating this provision. They claim they are discharged after every Giants homestand, at the end of the baseball season, and after other events at the park, and they are entitled under Labor Code section 201…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Kids Included Together CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bluestone Investment Inc., et al. v. Qizhong Hu, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Christine Wiley, et al. v. Universal Music Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Elizabeth Claiborne v. The Hertz CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Gola v. University of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.