Legal Opinion
Fledderman v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 15, 2013No. Case No. 1:11-cv-530Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 16). Plaintiff Debra Fledderman has filed an opposition (Doc. 21), and Defendant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. has filed a reply (Doc. 35). This matter is now ripe for review.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
While the facts in this case are extensive, the most relevant facts, as construed in favor of Plaintiff, are as follows:
A. Defendant
Defendant is a corporation that maintains a portfolio of marketed pharmaceuticals for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.