Murphy v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County and from an order denying a new trial. H. M. Albery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.—
This suit was brought to correct the description in a deed executed by defendants to plaintiff, of date October 4, 1898. But it was admitted on the trial by the defendant that the deed correctly described the land which plaintiff claimed it was intended to convey, consisting of certain subdivisions of the southeast and northeast quarters of sections 3 and 10, in the township referred to in the complaint; and, accordingly, it was so found by the court and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by his action. There is therefore no question as to the plaintiff’s case.
But in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Merguire v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hayes v. KhinooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934