Legal Opinion
United States v. Grahame P. Sanders, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1996No. 95-5744, 95-5819PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Grahame P. Sanders appeals his convictions and sentence for conspiring to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and committing wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Sanders asserts that the district court erred when it admitted allegedly prejudicial evidence, denied his motion to introduce a eo-conspirator’s acquittal, entered a restitution order, and valued the loss for sentencing purposes. The government cross-appeals, claiming that the district court failed to enhance Sanders’s sentence in accordance with the Sentencing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David Shew FeinmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gene R. "Moon" MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. Wendell LayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Lewis Francis (97-1129) and Louay Francis (97-1130)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Barrett N. Weinberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.