Legal Opinion

Richard Roemhild v. Dr. Grey Jones and Bull Sprig Hunting Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1960No. 16463PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Eoemhild from final judgment dismissing his complaint wherein he seeks recovery of real estate he conveyed to defendant Jones, and which Jones conveyed to defendant Bull Sprig Hunting Club, Inc. Plaintiff’s claim is based upon breach of option to repurchase reserved in his deed to Jones, and upon breach of covenant to construct a ditch to provide plaintiff with water. Jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount is established.

In Roemhild v. Jones, 8 Cir., 239 F.2d 492, we reversed a judgment on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pendergrass v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Richard Roemhild v. Dr. Grey Jones and Bull Sprig Hunting Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  4. Davis v. JerniganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  5. McCormick v. DaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of HullUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API