Legal Opinion

Funk v. Funk

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1924No. 10,906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, was defeated in a suit to recover of defendant contribution as cosurety on a promissory note. He brings the case here on error.

Plaintiff was appointed administrator of the estate of Nathaniel Funk by a Missouri probate court. He was compelled by the judgment of that court to pay a note on which the deceased and, as he claims, the defendant were sureties, and brought the suit now under question. He did not file a copy of his letters nor give bond as required by the Colorado statutes, C. L. §§ 5277, 5278.

The substance of the allegations of the amended…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. TindolphSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Currier v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. SMLL, L.L.C. v. Peak National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Ashton Properties, Ltd. v. OvertonColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Currier v. SutherlandColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Welker Clifford v. MerrillArizona Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API