Legal Opinion

Currier v. Sutherland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 2009No. 08SC587PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

This case involves invocation of the remedial revival statute, section 13-80-111(1), C.R.S. (2009), in a case where a complaint was timely filed against a deceased, nonexistent defendant and was later amended to name the estate of the deceased and the special administrator of that estate as defendants. We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Currier v. Sutherland, 215 P.3d 1155 (Colo.App.2008), in order to determine whether the statute can be used in such a case to revive a timely claim improperly filed against a non-existent defendant when the proper defendants were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Thompson v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Petition of EdilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tulips Investments, LLC v. State of Colorado ex rel.Suthers, Colorado Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. King Consolidated Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. People ex rel. StrodtmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Draper v. DeFrenchi-GordineerColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. A.E. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API