Legal Opinion
Moline v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 3, 2006No. 1D05-2815PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
983 So.2d 1 (2006)
Roger Carl MOLINE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D05-2815.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 3, 2006.
Appellant, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
The appellant challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion which alleged that his sentence exceeds the limits provided by law and the Sixth Amendment filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the appellant stated a facially sufficient claim, we reverse.
On April 11,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. MolineSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Joy Maturin and Norris Maturin Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Moline v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008