Legal Opinion

Crisel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1996No. 95-4013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of several drug offenses, and sentences were orally pronounced. Later during the same day the court ordered the revocation of the appellant’s driver’s license pursuant to section 322.055(1), Florida Statutes (1993). The appellant contends that this was an additional sentence which was impermissibly imposed in violation of the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. We conclude that it is unnecessary to decide whether the section 322.055(1) revocation constituted a sentence for double jeopardy purposes, as it was not shown on the record below that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clarence Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Rizzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API