Corley v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and has appealed.
A considerable part of the record consists of the examination of the jurors on their voir dire, and a number of the assignments of error relate to rulings made by the court on the competency of the jurors. Excerpts from the examination of the different veniremen would indicate that disqualified jurors were held competent; but a careful consideration of the questions and answers in their entirety leads us to the conclusion that no1 error was committed in this respect. There is much similarity in the questions and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Pendergrass v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Meyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lauderdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Tong v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Harvey v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.