Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 2000No. A00A2049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Netera Shaffer sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) seeking to recover payment of benefits and bad faith penalties and attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 33-4-6. The trial court granted State Farm’s motion for partial summary judgment on the OCGA § 33-4-6 bad faith claims, and Shaffer appeals. We affirm.

In reviewing grants of summary judgment, “this Court conducts a de novo review of the law and the evidence.” To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Rice v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Haezebrouck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Lancaster v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bellville v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Moon v. Mercury Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Matrix Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Worsham v. Provident Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
  5. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API