Legal Opinion

In re S.J.K.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2007No. Nos. 2006-0673 and 2006-0798PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

*24{¶ 1} We must determine whether the imposition of points against a traffic offender’s driving record and the effect of the points on the driver’s insurability constitute a “collateral disability” so as to preserve the justiciability of an appeal even after the traffic offender has satisfied the judgment.

{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that the imposition of points on a traffic offender’s driving record is a statutorily imposed penalty sufficient to create a collateral disability as a result of the judgment and preserves the justiciability of an appeal even if the offender has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. GolstonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland Heights v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. SadeghiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Olentangy Commons Owner, L.L.C. v. FawleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API