In re S.J.K.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
*24{¶ 1} We must determine whether the imposition of points against a traffic offender’s driving record and the effect of the points on the driver’s insurability constitute a “collateral disability” so as to preserve the justiciability of an appeal even after the traffic offender has satisfied the judgment.
{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that the imposition of points on a traffic offender’s driving record is a statutorily imposed penalty sufficient to create a collateral disability as a result of the judgment and preserves the justiciability of an appeal even if the offender has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. GolstonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- City of Cleveland Heights v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. SadeghiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Olentangy Commons Owner, L.L.C. v. FawleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.