State v. Walton
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Following John Walton’s acquittal of Rape1 and Criminal Deviate Conduct,2 the State appeals a reserved question of law3 contending that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction of evidence that the *499victim had made demonstrably false allegations of a prior rape. We discuss the following issues:
I. Whether the common law exceptions to the Rape Shield Rule which permitted the introduction of evidence that the victim had made prior allegations of rape shown to be demonstrably false survived the adoption of Indiana Rule of Evidence 608(b), which prohibits the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. LunaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. WaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998